This study examined realistically the forms themselves of the contents of Jeongjaedo depicted in ㆍㆍㆍㆍ that are included in Euigwe, compared them with Holgi, analyzed the reason and the reality in the content of mudo, re-examined in a broader perspective comprehensively, and concluded as the followings. Jeongjaedo of presents the dance type that performs the poguhui in the left and right sides of Bosangban. 14 pieces are included in 10 different kinds of Euigwe: 5 of them are Mudong and 9 of them are Yeoryeong. The contents of Mudong are categorized into 6 kinds: there are as few as 1 and as many as 6 having the same content. Jeongjaedo of presents the dance types of sadaejwawu-daehyeong, sabang-daehyeong, and jeonhu-daehyeong. 14 pieces are delivered in 14 different types of Euigwe: 5 of them are Mudong and 9 of them are Yeoryeong. The contents of Mudong are categorized into 4 kinds: there are as few as 1 and as many as 8 having the same content. Jeongjaedo of presents the dance types of obang-daehyeong and sawu-daehyeong. 14 pieces are included in 9 different kinds of Euigwe: 5 of them are Mudong and 9 of them are Yeoryeong. The contents of Mudong are categorized into 3 kinds: there are as few as 3 and as many as 6 having the same content. Jeongjaedo of presents the dance types of twodaejwau-daehyeong and pumja-daeyeong. 14 pieces are included in 10 different kinds of Euigwe: 5 of them are Mudong and 9 of them are Yeoryeong. The contents of Mudong are categorized into 4 kinds: there are as few as 2 and as many as 5 having the same content. Jeongjaedo of presents the dance type that the seonmo sacrifices the seondo. 15 pieces are included in 11 different kinds of Euigwe: 4 of them are Mudong and 11 of them are Yeoryeong. The contents of Mudong are categorized into 4 kinds: there are as few as 1 and as many as 9 having the same content. In most Jeongjaedo dances, the content, that is danced in one kind of daeyeong for one side, is presented, and and separate the two kinds of daeyhyeong into the upper level and the lower level simultaneously. Jeongjaedo was used to introduce various contents by dividing them into many pieces and to present them by repeating the same contents for each Jeongjae. By inserting the various contents into one drawing, the artist tried to present the Jeongjae contents in a variety of views, and made us to experience the reality of the Jeongjae contents recorded in letters in Holgi, and reflected even the unrecorded contents as well.

This study compared Jeongjaemudo Holgi (musical scripts) with video materials of “Mugo” (group dance from the Goryeo period) and “JangsaengboyeonJimu” (court music from the Joseon period) performed in the 1980s at ‘Traditional Dance Presentation’ of National Gugak Center following Simso Kim Cheon-heung’s restoration of them. By doing so, the study sought to learn how he had restored the court dances. As a result, the study found following characteristics of “Mugo” and “JangsaengboyeonJimu”. First, the greetings were added both in the beginning and the end of the performance. Second, the songs of the dancers were simplified. Third, there was no big change in dance formation. Fourth, there were omissions or additions in the procedure of the dance. When he restored court dance in the 1980s, the restoration was built on what he learned from Music Academy of the Joseon Dynasty and a number of materials including Akji (music book) of Goryeosa, that is lustrated Text on Traditional Music and Holgi. His restoration of the court dances in the 1980s was affected by periodical circumstances and creative experiences during the 1950s. This study concluded that the court dances he restored was the extension of tradition and literature interpretation. This study identified his spirit from his restoration which was completed based on experience and aesthetic attitude. Rather than sticking to the original literature, he showed the essence of the court dances as a new form of art by putting it on stage. He desired to turn the court dance into a contemporary proscenium stage art and to elevate it to the modern art form. As such, his restoration of the court dances in the 1980s was a process which he embraced the change of the period. Thus, Kim Cheon-heung can be considered as an artist who demonstrated artistic capability encompassing tradition.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the significance of Mu-ui (舞義, ritual of dance) by Seong Gyeong-rin in dance history and its value as Holgi (笏記, scroll document). This study identified the characteristics of the Japanese colonial period Jangsaengboyeonjimu (長生寶宴之舞, Dance of longevity) by comparing the record in Mu-ui to that in Jeongjaemudogholgi (呈才舞蹈笏記, scroll document of court dances). First, the costumes of dancers were five colors, and second, the song Changsha expresses simplification and degraded expression. Third, there was a slight difference in composition at the end. Fourth, in the dance, the order of the nine-sided dance was all the same, so there was no big change, but dance details were added to Mu-ui or little details were recorded. Fifth, there was a change in notation, but most of them had the same meaning or dancing. Those findings indicate that Mu-ui by Seong Gyeong-rin has the following values and significance in the dance history. First, it holds its value as a Holgi of Yiwangjikaakbu (李王 職雅樂部, the downgrated insitution of Jangakwon). Second, it offers information about the changes of court dance by Yiwangjikaakbu during Japanese colonial period. Finally, it enables the reproduction of Yiwangjikaakbu’s court dance by Mu-ui.